Skip to main content

STEM-on-the-Go Mobile Digital Fabrication Fleet (TIES)

The STEM-on-the-Go van

STEM-on-the-Go Mobile Digital Fabrication Vans promote transdisciplinary STEM learning through visits to locations in the DSEC hub regions. Programming includes STEM career explorations, including the integration of AI with digital fabrication. 

    Logic Model

    Program Activities

    Students (Grade K-12)

    Engage in digital fabrication-inspired engineering design challenges​ 

    Use or observe digital fabrication tools to develop/create products or protypes to address engineering design challenges​ 

    Learn about STEM careers through hands-on activities and connections​

    Program Near-Term Outcomes

    Students (Grade K-12)

    Gain awareness of the engineering design process (ask-imagine-plan-build-test-improve) ​ 

    Use the engineering design process to solve an engineering challenge​ 

    Learn to apply digital fabrication and design skills to open ended tasks as grade appropriate (Grade 6 and older)​ 

    Increase awareness of STEM careers

    DSEC Near-Term Outcomes

    Students (Grade K-12)

    Increased student engagement and interest in STEM (formal and informal) 

    Increased participant STEM competencies (skills, knowledge, abilities, and confidence) 

    Increased participant awareness of, and interest in, STEM research and careers

    Participant Perspectives

    Participant perspectives reflect survey responses from 2025-2026, the first year of survey administration.

    Of 1,012 student participants, 107 responded to the survey.

    Of 245 educator participants, 6 responded to the survey.

    Students

    Grades K-5

    • Strongly Disagree
    • Disagree
    • Agree
    • Strongly Agree
    STEM-on-the-Go improved my ability to use the engineering design process to solve a problem.
    n = 70 valid responses
    STEM-on-the-Go improved my knowledge of how to construct an object using digital fabrication tools (e.g., laser engraver, laser cutter, 3D printer).
    n = 70 valid responses
    STEM-on-the-Go improved my interest in using digital fabrication tools to design objects.
    n = 70 valid responses
    STEM-on-the-Go increased my curiosity about STEM careers that use digital fabrication tools.
    n = 70 valid responses
    Being part of STEM-on-the-Go made me more interested in engineering.
    n = 70 valid responses
    I learned about the engineering design process.
    n = 6 valid responses
    I learned about how to make things with machines like a laser cutter and 3D printer.
    n = 6 valid responses
    I want to know more about how to make things with machines like a laser cutter and 3D printer.
    n = 6 valid responses
    STEM-on-the-Go made me like engineering more.
    n = 6 valid responses

    Grades 6-16

    • Disagree
    • Slightly Agree
    • Moderately Agree
    • Strongly Agree
    STEM-on-the-Go improved my ability to use engineering design process to solve a problem.
    n = 37 valid responses
    STEM-on-the-Go improved my knowledge of how to construct an object using digital fabrication tools (for example, laser engraver, laser cutter, 3D printer).
    n = 37 valid responses
    STEM-on-the-Go increased my interest in using digital fabrication tools to design objects.
    n = 37 valid responses
    STEM-on-the-Go increased my curiosity about STEM careers that use digital fabrication tools.
    n = 37 valid responses

    Educators

    • Disagree
    • Slightly Agree
    • Moderately Agree
    • Strongly Agree
    The STEM-on-the-Go program increased my confidence for teaching students how to construct an object using digital fabrication tools.
    n = 6 valid responses
    The STEM-on-the-Go program increased my awareness of how to use the engineering design process to solve a problem.
    n = 6 valid responses
    The STEM-on-the-Go program increased my interest in using digital fabrication tools as part of hands-on STEM learning.
    n = 6 valid responses
    The STEM-on-the-Go program increased my awareness of STEM careers that use digital fabrication tools.
    n = 6 valid responses
    Program Data

    Program data includes participants from both years of Base Period (2024-2025 and 2025-2026). 

    Students

    3,567 total student participants

    Student Grade Level

    • Elementary: 1,796 students (50.4%)
    • Middle: 367 students (10.3%)
    • High: 382 students (10.7%)
    • 2-Year and/or Tech College Undergraduates: 10 students (0.3%)
    • Grade Level Not Listed: 1,012 students (28.4%)

    Military-Connected Students

    Category Count %
    Military-connected 750 21%
    Not Military-connected Student 2,817 79%

    Educators

    400 total educator participants

    Educator Type

    Category Count %
    District Administrator or Staff 21 5.3%
    School Administrator 16 4%
    Teacher 363 90.8%

    Educator Grade Levels

    • Elementary: 117 educators (29.3%)
    • Middle: 15 educators (3.8%)
    • High: 16 educators (4%)
    • 2-Year and/or Tech College Undergraduate: 3 educators (0.8%)
    • Undergrad: 4 educators (1%)
    • Grade Not Listed: 245 educators (61.3%)
    Category Count %
    Educator Elementary 117 29.3%
    Educator Middle 15 3.8%
    Educator High 16 4%
    Educator 2-Year and/or Tech College Undergraduate 3 0.8%
    Educator Undergrad 4 1%
    Educator Grade Not Listed 245 61.3%

    Military-Connected Educators

    Category Count %
    Military-connected 32 8%
    Not Military-connected Educator 368 92%